12 research outputs found

    Extending the supply chain to address sustainability

    Full text link
    © 2019 Elsevier Ltd In today's growing economy, overconsumption and overproduction have accelerated environmental deterioration worldwide. Consumers, through unsustainable consumption patterns, and producers, through production based on traditional resource depleting practices, have contributed significantly to the socio-environmental problems. Consumers and producers are linked by supply chains, and as sustainability became seen as a way to reverse socio-environmental degradation, it has also started to be introduced in research on supply chains. We look at the evolution of research on sustainable supply chains and show that it is still largely focused on the processes and networks that take place between the producer and the consumer, hardly taking into account consumer behavior and its influence on the performance of the producer and the supply chain itself. We conclude that we cannot be talking about sustainability, without extending the supply chains to account for consumers' behavior and their influence on the overall system performance. A conceptual framework is proposed to explain how supply chains can become sustainable and improve their economic and socio-environmental performance by motivating consumer behavior toward green consumption patterns, which, in turn, motivate producers and suppliers to change their operations

    Where does theory have it right? A comparison of theory-driven and empirical agent based models

    Full text link
    Computational social science has witnessed a shift from pure theoretical to empirical agent-based models (ABMs) grounded in data-driven correlations between behavioral factors defining agents’ decisions. There is a strong urge to go beyond theoretical ABMs with behavioral theories setting stylized rules that guide agents’ actions, especially when it concerns policy-related simulations. However, it remains unclear to what extent theory-driven ABMs mislead, if at all, a choice of a policy when compared to the outcomes of models with empirical micro-foundations. This is especially relevant for pro-environmental policies that increasingly rely on quantifying cumulative effects of individual behavioral changes, where ABMs are so helpful. We propose a comparison framework to address this methodological dilemma, which quantitatively explores the gap in predictions between theory-and data-driven ABMs. Inspired by the existing theory-driven model, ORVin-T, which studies the individual choice between organic and conventional products, we design a survey to collect data on individual preferences and purchasing decisions. We then use this extensive empirical microdata to build an empirical twin, ORVin-E, replacing the theoretical assumptions and secondary aggregated data used to parametrize agents’ decision strategies with our empirical survey data. We compare the models in terms of key outputs, perform sensitivity analysis, and explore three policy scenarios. We observe that the theory-driven model predicts the shifts to organic consumption as accurately as the ABM with empirical micro-foundations at both aggregated and individual scales. There are slight differences (±5%) between the estimations of the two models with regard to different behavioral change scenarios: increasing conventional tax, launching organic social-informational campaigns, and their combination. Our findings highlight the goodness of fit and usefulness of theoretical modeling efforts, at least in the case of incremental behavioral change. It sheds light on the conditions when theory-driven and data-driven models are aligned and on the value of empirical data for studying systemic changes

    Last Island: Exploring Transitions to Sustainable Futures through Play

    Full text link
    © 2019 Association for Computing Machinery. A serious game was designed and developed with the goal of exploring potential sustainable futures and the transitions towards them. This computer-assisted board game, Last Island, which incorporates a system dynamics model into a board game's core mechanics, attempts to impart knowledge and understanding on sustainability and how an isolated society may transition to various futures to a non-expert community of players. To this end, this collaborativecompetitive game utilizes the Miniworld model which simulates three variables important for the sustainability of a society: Human population, economic production and the state of the environment. The resulting player interaction offers possibilities to collectively discover and validate potential scenarios for transitioning to a sustainable future, encouraging players to work together to balance the model output while also competing on individual objectives to be the individual winner of the game

    The Effect of Technology Readiness on Individual Absorptive Capacity Toward Learning Behavior in Australian Universities

    Get PDF
    Recipient's absorptive capacity (ACAP) is a barrier to knowledge transfer in organizations. The technology readiness (TR) dimensions measure an individual's technological beliefs and aligns with the individual's ACAP. The purpose of this research is to study if technological beliefs have a causal effect onto individual learning capability and behaviour. University's knowledge transfer makes them an ideal context for this research. Through surveying individuals and conducting statistical analysis, the authors provide empirical evidence that there is a causal effect from the TR dimensions to individuals ACAP and their technological learning behaviour at the individual level. The findings could potentially help leverage technology to address said recipient's ACAP. It would also benefit the development of new technologies, in particular in e-learning and tailoring pedagogy.</p

    Modelling the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on a Hardware Retail Supply Chain

    Full text link
    © 2020 IEEE. Due to the current COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak, supply chains have been severely disrupted in long term globally. In this paper, we present the results of a simulation study conducted on a case of the global supply chain. We have discussed the impact of COVID19 on the supply chains by citing some recent examples in the retail sector in Australia. We demonstrate the use of simulation modelling to quickly and reliably model and analyze supply chain disruptions through the use of anyLogistix simulation software. In this paper, we have simulated a case of an Australian hardware retail supply chain that has a global supply network. We have investigated the impact of COVID19 disruptions on the supply chain performance. Our results highlighted the importance of waiting order cancellation strategy in the recovery period for reducing supply chain costs and maintaining service level. We also discussed the negative effect of distance between supplier and customer on the resiliency of delivery systems. This initial work was a proof of concept to simulate COVID19 disruptions on a retail supply chain

    Discussoo: Towards an intelligent tool for multi-scale participatory modeling

    Full text link
    In participatory modeling (PM), a conceptual model emerges from an exchange of information and opinions among stakeholders. This usually happens in a series of in-person workshops restricted to a certain number of attendees during designated time intervals. Our goal is to open up the PM workshop process to engage an unlimited number of participants at various locations, while supporting them with the functionality that the modeling context can offer. We develop a real-time, moderated steering environment, named Discussoo, to facilitate online PM. Users express their opinions about a topic by providing their comments in online discussions. As the discussion evolves, an ensemble of artificial intelligence algorithms in the background automatically produces a dynamic conceptual model to visualize the on-going exchange of opinions. Moderators can use this model to provide feedback to users and guide the discussion. Policymakers and managers can use Discussoo to support more transparent and meaningful engagement of stakeholders

    Exploring consumer behavior and policy options in organic food adoption: Insights from the Australian wine sector

    Full text link
    Organic food has important environmental and health benefits, decreasing the toxicity of agricultural production, improving soil quality, and overall resilience of farming. Increasing consumers’ demand for organic food reinforces the rate of organic farming adoption and the level of farmers' risk acceptance. Despite the recorded 20% growth in organically managed farmland, its global land area is still far less than expected, only 1.4%. Increasing demand for organic food is an important pathway towards sustainable food systems. We explore this consumer-centric approach by developing a theoretically- and empirically-grounded agent-based model. Three behavioral theories – theory of planned behavior, alphabet theory, and goal-framing – describe individual food purchasing decisions in response to policies. We take wine sector as an example to calibrate and validate the model for the case study of Sydney, Australia. The discrepancy between consumer intention and purchasing behavior for organic wine can be explained by a locked-in vicious cycle. We assess the effectiveness of different policies such as wine taxation, and informational-education campaigns to influence consumer choices. The model shows that these interventions are non-additive: raising consumer awareness and increasing tax on less environmentally friendly wines simultaneously is more successful in promoting organic wine than the sum of the two policies introduced separately. The phenomenon of undercover altruism amplifies the preference for organic wine, and the tipping point occurs at around 35% diffusion rate in the population. This research suggests policy implications to help decision-makers in the food sector make informed decisions about organic markets

    An intelligent simulation platform for train traffic control under disturbance

    Full text link
    © 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Railway disturbance management is inherently a multi-objective optimization problem that concerns both the operators’ cost and passenger’s service level. This study proposes a multi-objective simulation-based optimization framework to effectively manage the train conflicts after the occurrences of a disturbance caused by a temporary line blockage. The simulation model enhanced with a dynamic priority dispatching rule in order to speed up the optimization procedure. A multi-objective variable neighborhood search meta-heuristic is proposed to solve the train rescheduling model. The obtained Pareto optimal solutions for disturbance management model support the decision maker to find a trade-off between both user and operator viewpoints. The proposed approach has been validated on a set of disruption scenarios covering a large part of the Iranian rail network. The computational results prove that the proposed model can generate good-quality timetables with the minimum passenger delay and deviation from the initial timetable. The outcomes indicate that the developed simulation-based optimization approach has substantial advantages in producing practical solution quickly when compared to currently accepted solutions. Abbreviation: MOVNS: multi-objective variable neighbourhood search; DES: discrete-event simulation; SO: simulation-optimization; AG: Alternative Graph; FCFS: First Come First Served; MIP: mixed integer programming; MILP: mixed-integer linear programming; B&B: branch and bound algorithm; VND: Variable Neighborhood Descent; NSGA-II: Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm–II; CD: crowding distance; DP: dynamic priority; EDD: earliest due date first; SRTT: shortest remaining traveling time; LST: least slack time first

    An Agent-Based Model for Supply Chain Recovery in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Full text link
    The current COVID-19 pandemic has hugely disrupted supply chains (SCs) in different sectors globally. The global demand for many essential items (e.g., facemasks, food products) has been phenomenal, resulting in supply failure. SCs could not keep up with the shortage of raw materials, and manufacturing firms could not ramp up their production capacity to meet these unparalleled demand levels. This study aimed to examine a set of congruent strategies and recovery plans to minimize the cost and maximize the availability of essential items to respond to global SC disruptions. We used facemask SCs as an example and simulated the current state of its supply and demand using the agent-based modeling method. We proposed two main recovery strategies relevant to building emergency supply and extra manufacturing capacity to mitigate SC disruptions. Our findings revealed that minimizing the risk response time and maximizing the production capacity helped essential item manufacturers meet consumers’ skyrocketing demands and timely supply to consumers, reducing financial shocks to firms. Our study suggested that delayed implementation of the proposed recovery strategies could lead to supply, demand, and financial shocks for essential item manufacturers. This study scrutinized strategies to mitigate the demand–supply crisis of essential items. It further proposed congruent strategies and recovery plans to alleviate the problem in the exceptional disruptive event caused by COVID-19
    corecore